At least 2,000 protesters, in white and green, marched around Ternate town in Cavite starting 7 a.m. Thursday to express opposition to the town council's resolution approving a sanitary landfill project within a portion of a protected area and buffer zone.

The protesters included residents, students, teachers, parents and nongovernment organizations.

Fr. Cedric Mendez and members of the Iglesia Filipina Independiente joined the protest.

Ochie Tolentino, coordinator of the Cavite Green Coalition, said in a phone interview that majority of Ternate residents opposed the project that would be located inside the Mt. Palay-Palay/Mataas na Gulod National Park.

It will cover 10 hectares in the village of Sapang within the province's biggest protected area, which is teeming with unique biodiversity and wildlife.

Mt. Palay-Palay has been declared as a protected area by virtue of Proclamation 1594 in October 1976.

According to the Ecowaste Coalition, the park hosts at least 123 species of wildlife, 31 percent of which are endangered or threatened--including the Luzon Bleeding Heart, Philippine Falcon, Blue Naped Parrot and Philippine Woodland Frog.

Tolentino said the approval of the project violated Republic Act 9003 or the Ecological Solid Waste Management Act of 2000, the law prohibiting the setting up of landfills on an aquifer or watershed area.

She said the project, which got an environmental compliance certificate on September 26, 2007, would deprive the residents of Ternate and nearby towns of clean source of water.

Para sa mga nagsusulong ng proyektong ito, hindi lang 2000 ang tutol sa Ternate Landfill at hindi pa ito ang huling pagkilos ng mga maka-kalikasang Kabitenyo para tutulan ang proyektong ito.

Related Posts

• Ternate Landfill: A Call for Action by Dok Natividad
• Bagyong Ondoy – bunga ng Climate Change
• Car shows are conventions for Air polluters
• Drama sa USC Scholarship
• Nakatengga at darating na gawain…

-------------------------

a proposed landfill threatens mts palay palay/ mataas na gulod national park (better known to us mountaineers as Pico De Loro).. please read and please spread the word.. we really really need every help we can get with regards to this issue. -- Gerard "dok" Natividad

It was during the first months of the year 2006 when vigilant Cavite-based environmental groups, Non-Government Organizations (NGOs), People’s Organizations (POs), religious, academic institutions, and others first heard of a startling project that caused a once peaceful and silent upland municipality to engage into a heightened level of awareness and to unite in action opposing a multi-million peso project in their area.

A proposal for a sanitary landfill that would cater for the province’s so-called waste management problem was submitted to the office of the Provincial Governor by its proponent, Environsave, Inc. An estimated 8 hectare piece of land just at the footsteps of a National Park would serve as cradle for wastes generated by a whole province. As if inadvertent, the proposed site is located within the area of the quarrying company- Cavite Ideal (better known as Cavdeal), who happens to be the same people behind the landfill project. These series of events eventually led to the formation of a community-based, people’s organization called Ternateños Against Landfill Association (TALA) comprising of representatives from various sectors in Ternate, Cavite. A concrete example of a classic community organizing principle wherein environmental groups, NGO’s and the like, coming from outside the community facilitated the basic information with regards the issue and “which correspondingly stimulate local initiative and leadership as the primary instrument of change.” (Polson, In The Lasallian Way towards social transformation (p.100) Lasallian Community Development Center)

This truly is an effective strategy of participatory, people-centered and area-based initiatives to address the landfill issue. With the collaborative efforts being done by different concerned sectors, manual and technical support systems to address the landfill issue has greatly materialized. Ranging from dialogues with the Local Government Units, consultative meetings and presentations with both the proponent and stakeholders, data gathering and inquiries with legal counsels and technical experts, ground-working and paper-trailing the different documents concerning the project, and also, there had been 4 major rallies and mobilizations which reflects advocacy leading to action through a peaceful yet active non-violent display of deep community concern.

All these efforts eventually led to an empowered PO and a well-coordinated and consorted effort to oppose the project. During the course of all these, various standpoints and arguments came to light on why there is a dire need for the project not to push through. Listed below are some of these reasons as well as steps done by the groups:

• We believe this to be otherwise. We have yet to determine this by an actual site visit and GPS reading.
• The proposed site for the landfill is situated right beside? the buffer zone of a national park as proclaimed in Oct. 26, 1976 by then President Ferdinand Marcos under Proc. No. 1594 “Declaring Mts. Palay-palay/ Mataas na Gulod and vicinities situated in the municipalities of Ternate and Maragondon, province of Cavite and the municipality of Nasugbu, province of Batangas, island of Luzon as a National Park, Game refuge and bird sanctuary.”

Just this year, President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo issued Proc. No. 1315 “Declaring Mts. Palay-palay/ Mataas na Gulod National park as Protected Area which shall be known as Mts. Palay-palay Mataas na Gulod Protected Landscape.” Signed this June 27, 2007.Thus, being declared as a protected area, this ought to have stricter policies and guidelines favoring the anti-ternate landfill groups. But the proclamation also led us to doubt that a much grander scheme is at work favoring the landfill. Here are some of the ‘questionable and dubious” statements in the Proc.no.1315.

1. The original land area of the park was 4000 hectares, but it was narrowed to 3973.13 hectares as stated in proc. no. 1315.
2. As stated in the proclamation no.1315, the protected landscape would now be “subject to private rights”.
3. When the “technical descriptions” of the proclamation was plotted to a topographic map, it showed a difference of area of the delineation than that of existing records of the park’s original boundaries

Former President Marcos issued Proclamation no.1520 dated Nov.28, 1975 “Declaring the municipalities of Maragondon and Ternate in Cavite and the municipality of Nasugbu in Batangas province as a Tourist Zone, and for other purposes.” which is under the jurisdiction of the Philippines Tourism Authority. Contrary to what the proponent says about tourism, the anti-ternate landfill groups believes that this facility would only drive away tourists en route to the beaches and mountaineering/trekking destinations in Ternate if ever the project might proceed.

According to the Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRR) of the Republic Act 9003 also known as Ecological Solid waste management Act of 2000, as stated in Section 40. Criteria for Sitting a Sanitary Landfill. (d) “The site must be chosen with regard for the sensitivities of the community’s residents.” The project should gain Social Acceptability from the community concern. But the community’s opposition to the project is reflected by these courses of actions:

1. Series of rallies and mass mobilizations participated by the thousands around the town of Ternate which was also featured in different television, radio and print media.
2. Signature campaign comprising of 12,000 signatures of Ternate residents from a population of 20,000 which was submitted to the Environmental Management Bureau region 4A (EMB-4A) and the DENR main office to stand as basis for the government agency not to issue an Environmental Compliance Certificate (ECC). But eventually they did issue an ECC dated Sept.26, 2007.
3. The residents and organized groups also decided to file a petition to the COMELEC Proposing By Local Initiative the Enactment of an Ordinance under RA 6735 entitled, “An ordinance declaring Barangay Sapang, Municipality of Ternate, Province of Cavite as being an integral part of the continuing classification of the municipality of Ternate as a Tourist zone and further classifying Barangay Sapang as a Special Ecological Zone, prohibiting the opening, construction and operation of any sanitary landfill therein, providing penalties for violation of this ordinance and for other purposes,” as a municipal ordinance for the municipality of Ternate, Cavite. Rare is the instance that this type of move is done wherein a given percentage of voting population would make a move to enact an ordinance. Being this, lawyers from the Comelec faced a blank wall upon receiving this document. And we are currently on the move and looking for assistance from legal counsels who could shed some light with this type of action.

According also to the Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRR) of the Republic Act 9003 also known as Ecological Solid waste management Act of 2000, as stated in Section 40. Criteria for Sitting a Sanitary Landfill. (e) “The site must be located in an area where the landfill’s operation will not detrimentally affect environmentally sensitive resources such as Aquifer, Groundwater reservoir or watershed areas.”

Also from the IRR of RA 9003. Penal Provisions. Section 48. Prohibited Acts (16) “The construction or operation of landfills or any waste disposal facility on any Aquifer, Groundwater reservoir or watershed area and on any portions thereof.”

• The proposed site for the landfill is declared part of the study area by the Local Water Utilities Authorities (LWUA) and the Japanese International Cooperating Agency (JICA) issued last 1995 as a Groundwater Basin and declared also by Bechtel Engineering hired by Puerto Azul Resort as a Water Basin.
• As stated in the “Report on the Geological assessment of the proposed sanitary landfill located inside the quarry site of Cavdeal in Ternate, Cavite” prepared by the Mines and Geosciences Bureau (MGB) of the DENR, “Based on the groundwater availability map of the Philippines, the project area has fairly extensive and productive Aquifers with average annual potential recharge of 0.3 to 0.8meter.”
• Safe drinking water for the surrounding municipalities are threatened by the facility. Because one of the major hazardous by-products by landfills are called Leachate. According to the University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire website, “Leachate is a potentially toxic fluid that could leak from a landfill site and pollute aquifers and surface water.”
• According to the same report that was released by the MGB, it states that the site “Is located in a creek valley bounded by two high hilly terrains… The creek is part of the tributary of the Sapang River.” We all know that water always go down stream, having the site as a tributary for a river would surely be alarming for those living down stream. Contaminated water can easily flow to other tributaries posing a threat not only to humans and animals but also plants.

Hydrologic hazard stated in the “Report on the Geological assessment of the proposed sanitary landfill located inside the quarry site of Cavdeal in Ternate, Cavite” prepared by the MGB indicates that “Since the proposed area for landfill site is situated on a drainage floor, it is very likely that the area may experience flash flooding caused by heavy runoff coming from the upstream area.” Let us not set aside the fact that the site proposed is within a quarry site. The capacity of the soil to hold moisture has already been depleted and that if a flash flood may occur, it could easily boulders and rocks that can easily be dislodged from the site due to the quarrying activity. This, again, pose a major threat to the community’s safety and welfare.

Mts Palay palay/ Mataas na Gulod National Park is home to a wide array of flora and fauna and quite a number of endemic and endangered species. Studies and researches are being conducted in the area both by students and faculties from De La Salle University- Dasmariñas in Dasmariñas, Cavite. And biodiversity conservation is one of their main thrusts in their field. The national park is one of the identified sites in the book: Key Conservation Sites in the Philippines: A Haribon Foundation and Birdlife International Directory of Important Bird Areas (IBAs) by Mallari, Neil Aldrin, et. al. (2001). And having such a facility in the area may create a big imbalance in the ecology that might affect the sensitive wildlife.

In the presentations conducted by Environsave regarding the landfill, one of the components of the said facility is a Materials Recovery Facility, wherein the said landfill shall be receiving ‘mixed (unsegregated) waste’ from all over the province and that segregation shall be done on-site. It is clearly stated again, in the IRR of RA 9003 Article 2. Segregation of Wastes. Section21. Mandatory Segregation of Solid Wastes. “That segregation of wastes shall primarily be conducted at the source, to include household, institutional, industrial, commercial and agricultural sources.” If the facility will be receiving mixed waste, then there would be no effort done at the household level to help reduce, reuse, refuse and recycle wastes. The very heart of RA 9003 is that it must be done at source.

Traffic and road-safety also is a major concern. If the facility would be catering for all the trash the province would produce then it may create unrest for those living along the highways that these trucks would pass by. Foul smell (due to unsegregated wastes), noise pollution and safety for both commuters and pedestrians at stake if there are an added number of trucks passing a single route to a common destination. Even if it has ‘transfer stations’ it would still not discount the fact that trucks would be set to go to these so-called transfer stations as proposed by the proponent. Highways and road systems will also be subjected to damage due to the volume and capacity of these bridges and roadways to service large and heavy dump trucks.

Based on the reprint of Rachel’s Environment and Health Weekly (#37 Aug10,1987, #116 Feb.14,1989, #617 Sept.24, 1998)

• #37: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency says All Landfills Leak, even those using best available liners.
• #116: Analyzing why all landfills leak.
• #617: Landfills are dangerous.

Here in the Philippines there are quite a number of experiences that so-called landfill proponents submit proposals for a Sanitary Landfill that in the end only ends up to be an open dumpsite and control dumpsite. But, in paper, they all claim to be landfills. Unfortunately irreversible damage has been done to these sites with the cost of both human and environmental costs. This is true with the “landfills” located in San Mateo in Rizal, Payatas, San Jose Del Monte in Bulacan and even Clark and in Cebu. All of them ended up to be well below of what was expected to be as a “sanitary” landfill.

Based also in the official report released by the MGB, it states that “Geographically, the project site is centered at coordinates, 120 degrees 41’ 30” East Long. And 14degrees 05’ 57.2” North Lat.” Supposedly, this coordinates would fall at the center of the proposed landfill site. But when we plotted these coordinates, we made a startling discovery. It centered nowhere near the known landfill site or even nowhere near Cavdeal, the quarry company beside the site. The said coordinates when plotted to a topographic map, fell somewhere in the municipality of Nasugbu, Batangas. This being a major discrepancy in the official report released by the MGB.

In the study conducted by Tengonciang, et al. 2002, the soil along Ternate, Maragondon, and up to Magallanes are said to be volcanic.

With all these information at hand, we are calling for those who in one way or another could be of help regarding this matter. The Office of the Provincial Government (OPG) of Cavite is supporting the proponent with regards to the project. But the different sectors concerned will not be taking this sitting down. Moves have been made also by the Diocese of Imus and dialogues between the diocese and the OPG have already been ensuring. Support groups coming from outside Cavite also flourished through contacts and linkages of those involved. NGO’s, Professionals, and other institutions are currently working together to offer alternatives and training programs to address this issue.

We, as Lasallians must take part in such an undertaking. The Lasallian Community Development Center has been part of the issue since the very beginning of the matter, lending a hand during the preliminary meetings while organizing the community, providing some technical and information/ education campaign for the enrichment of those concerned. Coordinating with other linkages as well as other offices within the University for a more holistic and synergic approach to attaining Social Transformation. In the past, we have been part of the closure of the Carmona Landfill and opposing the construction of the Magallanes Landfill which eventually led to the formation of the Cavite Greens Coalition- Kalikasan to whom LCDC is also a member. This is a call for action to us Lasallians, as part and parcel of a much larger community rather than just being in the confines of our walls, let us make a move to inflict the change that we want to see in the society…bearing in mind that all these must be in the context of a Lasallian touch and in line with the Lasallian Guiding Principles.

This is a call for action to all those who would want to preserve the pristine environment of Ternate, we as mountaineers/ environmentalists, being the guardians of the mountains specially in this case, the national park wherein Pico de Loro is part of.

Gerard S. Natividad
Project Officer, Environmental Advocacy, Lasallian Community Development Center, DLSU-D
Adviser, DLSU-D Mountaineering Society
Member, Cavite Green Coalition-Kalikasan
Member, 505th Search and Rescue Auxiliary Group, Inc

Related Posts

• Hindi lang 2000 ang tutol sa Ternate Landfill
• Bagyong Ondoy – bunga ng Climate Change
• Car shows are conventions for Air polluters
• Drama sa USC Scholarship
• Nakatengga at darating na gawain…

Pero nananatiling buhay ang pagkahilig ko sa mga magagarang sasakyan, bumibili ako ng mga magazines noon, madami din ang akong laro sa PC na tungkol sa mga kotse at karera tulad ng Formula 1, Need for Speed at GTA. Bumili pa nga ako ng isang MOMO Racing Wheel na gawa ng Logitech para kahit man lang sa mga computer games ay nararanasan ko ang pakiramdam ng magmaneho at makiapg unahan kasama ang mga kampyon na sina Michael Schumacher at Mikka Hakkinen.

Hindi lang sa pangarap bagkos ganoon din sa mga realidad ko, sa uri ng aking mga gawain sa loob at labas ng DLSUD, kung saan-saan ako nakakarating. Tuwing maiimbitahan ako na maging ispiker o tagapagsanay sa mga palihan o training workshops, mga conventions, mga seminars at simpleng paglilibang, madaming nagsasabi na kailangan ko ng sariling sasakyan para maging maalwan para sa aking sarili.

Pero hindi, mas gusto ko, mas sanay ako na magbyahe sa pamamagitan ng pampublikong sasakyan. Mas tipid ngayon kaysa sa pagmamaneho ng sariling sasakyan dahil sa ubod ng mahal ng gasolina at krudo. Mas magaan sa pakiramdam dahil pwede akong matulog, magtext at makinig ng tugtugin habang nasa byahe nang walang pag-aalinlangan dahil hindi naman ako ang nagmamaneho.

Pero ang isa sa mga malaking dahilan kung bakit kuntento ako sa pagiging byahero at hindi nagmamaneho ay dahil sa isa sa aking mga adbokasiya ang pangangalaga sa kalikasan. Sa panahon natin ngayon na lumala ang sitwasyon dahilan sa global warming, ginagawa ko ang lahat ng aking makakaya, sa personal na kapasidad, upang makabawas sa poluyson.

Aminin natin na tayong mga tao lamang ang nakakalikha ng polusyon kaya sa atin lamang pwedeng isisi ang pagkasira ng kalikasan. Nakakita ka na ba ng mga hayop na gumawa ng pabrika para makakuha ng pagkain nila?

Mabalik ako, ano ang koneksyon ng pangangalaga ko sa kalikasan at pagiging kontento sa pagiging byahero imbis na bumili ng sariling sasakyan? Narito ang sagot:

The important sources of atmospheric pollution on a global or regional scale are:

1. Automobiles. According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), driving a car is the single most polluting thing that most of us do. Motor vehicles emit millions of tons of pollutants into the air each year. In many urban areas, motor vehicles are the single largest contributor to ground-level ozone, a major component of smog.

The primary pollutants produced by automobiles are:
1. Hydrocarbons. They come from the evaporation of fuel, especially on hot days, leaking fluids, and during refueling at gas stations.
2. Nitrogen oxides. Produced by high heat during the burning of fuel.
3. Carbon monoxide. Produced by the incomplete burning of fuel.

Modern automobiles pollute much less than older models thanks to emission controls including catalytic converters. But the number of cars is so large, and they are driven so much, they are still major sources of pollution. (source)

Kitams? Malaking kasalanan para kay Inang Kalikasan ang paggamit ng sariling sasakyan ngayon. Pero dahil hindi maiwasan, minumungkahi ko na mag carpool o magsama-sama sa isang sasakyan kung meron ang isa sa mga kasama nyo. May polusyon pa rin dahil sa sasakyan pero nabawasan dahil isang sasakyan lang ang dala niyo, sa halip na tag-iisa kayong lahat na magkakabarkada o grupo.

Sa bayan nga ng Silang kung saan ako lumaki, umuso ang mga scooter o motor na pambinata. Gumagastos sila ng malaki para maging "maporma" ang kanilang motor. May mga ilaw, malakas na soundsystem, magara ang pintura, pero ang resulta ay ingay at polusyon. Sagabal pa nga sa mga prusisyon at parada dahil nakakainis na usok at ingay lamang ang kanilang nalilikha. Ubod pa ng yabang ang karamihan sa mga ito, nagkaroon lamang ng motor ay akala mo kung sinong may mahalagang ginagawa sa lipunan, tambay lang naman pala ang iba. (Pasintabi po)

Ganoon din sa mga kotse o sasakyan na apat ang gulong. Totoong maporma at magarang tingnan, pero sa bandang huli, ano ang epekto nito sa ating kapaligiran? Sa ating mga kapwa tao at ibang nilalang?

Kaya kung mapapansin nyo, noong eleksyon sa DLSUD, hindi kami kumukuha ng mga sasakyan at nagmomotorcade. Bukod sa wala kaming pondo para sa gasolina, Ingay at polusyon lamang naman ang nililikha nito, dagdag dito, nagiging mayabang kami sa mata ng mga nakararaming estudyante na ang iniisip ay nang-iinggit lamang kami sa tuwing may sasakyan kami. Tapos hiram lang pala ang mga sasakyan, kaya sino ang niloko namin? (Muli, pasintabi)

Ngayon, kung ang isang sasakyan at pagmamaneho nito ay isa sa mga pinaka-malakas sa polusyon, ano pa kaya kung magsama-sama ang mga ito sa isang car show o convention?

Sa tingin ng mga may malasakit sa kalikasan ito ay convention ng mga air polluters

Related Posts

• Hindi lang 2000 ang tutol sa Ternate Landfill
• Ternate Landfill: A Call for Action by Dok Natividad
• Drama sa USC Scholarship
• Nakatengga at darating na gawain…
• Simula ng student power sa DLSUD

Sa kasalukuyan, mayroong 20(?) iskolar ang USC ngayon, mas mataas kumpara noong nakaraang taon. Ngunit hindi ata naging usap-usapan ang pagtaas ng bilang ng mga iskolar. Ang mas napag-uusapan ay ang mga iskolar, magulang at mga ilang administrador na nababahala at nababagabag dahil kahit nadagdagan ang bilang ng mga iskolar, nabawasan naman ang mga tunay na matutulungan nito.

Sa 17 iskolar ng nakalipas na USC, mas madami ang bilang (percentage) ng mga may "full scholarship" kumpara sa ngayon, iisa o dalawa lang daw ang nabigyan ng "full scholarship" kaya, lubhang nakakalungkot, marami-rami sa mga nakaraang iskolar ang hindi makakapag-aral ngayong pasukan, kahit na 50% ang scholarship nila. Sa lalong pagtaas ng mga bilihin, langis, matrikula at iba pa ngayong kasalukuyan, higit na kinakailangan ng mga kapos-palad nating kapwa Lasalyano ang lahat ng tulong upang ipagpatuloy nila ang kanilang pag-aaral. Ang pagiging iskoloar ang isa sa kanilang mga malubhang inaasahan.

Ginawa ang mga mapayapa at tamang proseso para subukang umapila sa kasalikuyang USC na sana'y mabago ang kanilang desisyon at madagdagan ang matatanggap ng mga iskolar. Ngunit, matapos ang mga pag-uusap at pakikipagdayalogo, desedido na raw ang bagong USC na kung ano ang kanilang napagdesisyunan ay yun na talaga.

Totoo na may kalayaan at karapatan ang USC na pagdesisyunan ang pagbibigay ng mga scholarships. Totoo rin na may kalayaan at karapatan silang itakda ang panuntunan at proseso sa kung sino ang mabibigyan ng scholarships.

Pero hindi ibig sabihin nito ay bahala na sila sa kung ano man ang kanilang mapagdesisyunan. Bilang mga lider-estudyante, higit na inaasahan na ang kanilang mga desisyon ay para makapaglingkod sa interes at kapakanan ng mga estudyante at alinsunod sa mga dakilang aral ni San Juan Buatista De La Salle.

Aking napagalaman na isa sa mga dahilan kung bakit di umano'y ayaw nilang pagbigyan na magkaroon ng adjustment o dagdag sa matatanggap ng ibang iskolar ay "kapag nag-adjust sa isa, kailangang mag-adjust sa lahat."

Sa unang tingin ay tama at patas ang ganoong pangangatwiran hindi ba? Pero kung susuriin ay may kamailan. Ang mga bihasa o nag-aral ng Logic ay sasang-ayon sa akin sa ganitong pagaanalisa at paggiba sa ganitong argumento.

"kapag nag-adjust sa isa, kailangang mag-adjust sa lahat." Hindi ba't sa unang tingin pa lang ay may fallacy na sa argumentong ito? Ang fallacy na ito ay ang fallacy of generalization, o pagtingin na pare-pareho lamang ang lahat kahit na sadyang magkakaiba ang mga ito.

Kahit na pare-parehong matindi ang pangangailangan ng mga iskolars ay magkakaiba pa rin ang kanilang indibidwal na kalagayan at pinanggagalingang sitwasyon, circumstances ika nga.

Ito ang dahilan kung bakit kailangan nilang magpasa ng mga dokumento at papeles na magsasalarawan at magpapatunay sa kung gaanong kalubha ang kanilang pangangailangan at kaya isa-isa silang nakakapanayam sa screening interviews. Ito rin ang dahilan kung bakit hindi sila pare-pareho ng mga antas o pursyentong natatanggap para sa scholarship.

Kaya hindi pwede na sabihing dahil binawasan ang kay A, ay babawasan din ang matatanggap ni B, C at haggang kay Z dahil magkakaiba sila ng pangangailangan. Sana ay maunawaan natin itong lahat.

Tandaan natin na sila ay nahalal upang paglingkuran ang interes ng mga mag-aaral. Ang pagbibigay ng scholarship ay isa sa mga pinakadakila at malaking obligasyon nila dahil sa bandang huli, ang perang nakapaloob sa kanilang pondo o badyet ay nanggaling din sa ating mga mag-aaral ng DLSUD. Samakatuwid, higit ang ating karaptan sa perang iyon.

Huwag din sana kalimutan ang pangarap ng De La Salle Philippines na maging katotohanan ang One La Salle Scholarship kung saan 20% ng buong populasyon ng mga estudyante sa mga La Salle schools ay mga iskolar pagdating ng 2011. Sa nangyayari ngayon, tila hindi makakapagambag ang ating mga lider-estudyante sa pangarap na ito.

Kasiyahan o pangangailangan?

Isa pang bagay na mapupulot natin dito ay makita ang prayoridad o mga mahahalagang bagay sa isang pamunuan, na siyang makikita natin sa kung paano ginagamit o saan inilalaan ng Konseho ang badyet o pera ng mga estudyante. Kung mas malaki ang bahagi ng badyet para sa serbisyong estudyante tulad ng scholarships, student loans at sponsorship sa mga student orgs, (mga basic student needs) masasabi natin na "student-service oriented" ang Konseho. Pero kung napupunta sa mga ibang gawain at proyekto na makakapagpasaya sa estudyante (student wants) masasabi natin na "student-entertainment oriented" ang ating konseho.

Pero, malaki ang aking pag-asa na ang nauna at hindi ang huling uri ng panunugkulan ang dala-dala ng mga lider-estudyante natin ngayon. At para maging patas naman, nag-uumpisa pa lang ang bagong pang-akademikong taon.

Related Posts

• Nakatengga at darating na gawain…
• Simula ng student power sa DLSUD
• MASA: Tumaas ang Matrikula, Estudyante Kakasa Ka Ba?
• Ang mapanupil na Exam Permit
• Debate naman…para sa Finals

Marahil magtataka ang mga nakakakilala sa akin sa DLSUD dahil tapos na ang termino ko sa University Student Council pero bakit nasabi ko pa ring mas madami ang aking extra-curriculars ngayon.

Nariyan ang pagpapatuloy at pag-pokus ko sa mga gawaing pang-adbokasiya, partikular sa pag-oorganisa ng mga estudyante sa DLSUD upang tugunan ang mga tawag ng panahon at pagpapatuloy ng Lasalyanong misyon. Sa mga darating na araw ay ikukwento ko ito ng mas detalyado.

Sumunod naman ang panunumbalik ko sa SERVE Volunteers ng LCDC. Ang organisasyon pinagmulan naming mga nanungkulan sa USC nitong nakaraang taon. Nakakalungkot lamang na nagsipagtapos na ang mga kasabayan kong boluntir at lider-estudyante. Kung hindi ako nagkakamali, ako ang pinka-kuya ngayon sa SERVE. Sana lang ay maging maayos at produktibo ang taong ito para sa aming mga boluntir. Kung gusto nyo maging SERVE boluntir, pumunta lang kayo sa LCDC, 2nd floor ng SBC canteen at handa kaming salubungin kayo ng may libreng mamon pa. (jowk lang! pero welcome na welcome kayo mag boluntir)

Bukod sa SERVE volunteers, nariyan din ang pagtulong ko sa Vox La Salle Debating Society, isang organisasyong binuo ko kasama ng mga ilang kaibigan upang buhayin ang kultura ng pakikipag-debate at kritikal na pag-iisip ng mga Lasalyano.

Shempre, nariyan pa rin ang pagtulong ko uli sa Genshiken, may isa pang proyekto kasi na naisantabi noong nakaraang taon na malaki ang aking naging bahagi. Gusto kong matuloy ito ngayong taon. Pero shempre, nasa sa kanila pa rin ang desisyon.

Hindi rin mawawala ang pagsuporta ko sa bandang Mannequin. Maraming magandang nangyari nitong nakaraang taon sa aking tingin ay naging mabuti ito para sa kanilang pag-unlad bilang isang banda, rakista at musikero. (Kailangan ko na talagang tapusin ang websayt nila )

Dahil nabanggit ko na rin ang mga websayt, hahay! Madami din akong nakatenggang gawain at proyektong onlayn.

Nariyan ang pagtapos ko sa websayt ng LIFE, ang pagbubukas ko ng isa ko pang blog at ang pagbabalik-sulat ko sa Sumilang. Balak kong ituloy ang pagsusulat tungkol sa mga kaganapan sa lipunang Pilipino at tungkol sa kalikasan. Ang dami no? Goodluck talaga sa akin.

Related Posts

• Drama sa USC Scholarship
• Debate naman…para sa Finals
• Pasaway na Globe technicians…
• Libreng WiFi sa DLSUD, Libre ba Talaga?
• Wala namang maisulat…pero madaming kwento

Magbibigay kami ng sulat para sa aming pangulo na si Bro Gus, at magsusumamong bigyan kaming mga 85 biktima ng panghaharang, panggigipit at panunupil ng mga karapatan noong 29 ng Pebrero ng mas malaking bahagi ng kanyang atensyon dahil ang aming sitwasyon at karanasan ay hindi magaan na bagay.

Kung ano ang magiging hakbang ng pamunuan ng DLSUD sa mga isyung nakapaloob dito ay magkakaroon ng epekto na posibleng hindi makakatulong sa pamantasan bilang isang Lasalyano, Kristyano at makabayang institusyong pang-edukasyon.

Pero hindi naman namin aawayin o tutuligsain si Bro Gus, bagkos, ipapakita lamang namin na ang mga estudyante sa DLSUD ay hindi basta-basta na lamang mananahimik sa gitna ng mga kamalian, kawalan hustisya at garapalang pang-aabuso sa kapangyarihan lalo't higit kami ang mga biktima.

Ipapakita lamang namin na isinasabuhay namin ang mga dakilang aral na itinuturo ng DLSUD sa amin. Ang manindigan para sa katotohanan, hustisya at kung ano ang wasto.

Sana lang at tiwala naman ako na hindi rin kami aawayin ni Bro Gus sa aming mga gagawin. Sana talaga. hehehehe

Related Posts

• Ateneo 1, La Salle 0
• Drama sa USC Scholarship
• Hindi lang 2000 ang tutol sa Ternate Landfill
• Ternate Landfill: A Call for Action by Dok Natividad
• Car shows are conventions for Air polluters